|
| |
Assessment for Learning & Assessment of
Learning |
|
Educators are now using the terms assessment
for learning and assessment
of learning to differentiate between the
coaching and judging functions teachers carry out in their
classrooms.
Assessment for Learning encompasses
both diagnostic (initial) and formative (feedback) assessment;
it is assessment that occurs during the instruction process.
Its primary function is to help students improve their
learning.
Assessment of Learning includes all
summative assessment. It occurs when a teacher wants to
determine the extent of a student's achievement in relation
to the provincial standard.
| Comparing
Assessment FOR Learning and Assessment OF Learning |
| Assessment
FOR Learning |
Assessment
OF Learning |
- designed to assist teachers and students by
checking learning to decide what to do next
- used in conferencing
- uses detailed and descriptive feedback in words,
not scores
- focuses on improvement of student's previous
best
|
- designed to provide information to parenst,
school, and board level administration, as well
as students
- presented in periodic report
- summarizes information with numbers or letter
grades
- compares student's achievement with provincial
standard
|
Related Links
|
 |
| |
What makes a Good Rubric? |
|
| |
Assessment Support Documents |
|
A. Evaluation of Ontario Curriculum Expectations
Program Planning and Assessment
http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/progplan912curr.pdf
"Assessment
is the process of gathering information from a variety
of sources (including assignments, demonstrations, projects,
performances and tests) that accurately reflects how
well a student is achieving the curriculum expectations
in a course or subject. As
part of assessment, teachers provide students with descriptive
feedback that guides their efforts towards improvement.
Evaluation refers to the process of judging the quality
of student work on the basis of established criteria
and assigning a value to represent that quality. |
 |
| 
|
Draft Achievement
Charts
In performance tasks that address curriculum expectations
from several Ontario Curricula and Board Curricula
the teacher must decide which expectations addressed
in the task will be assessed formally for summative
assessment. The Draft
Achievement Charts are very consistent in the
language used to evaluate student achievement.
Tracking Achievement
You may be interested in using this tracking
sheet in either editable
StarOffice format or printable
PDF format. The sheet has room for the results
from 5 tasks, each of which can be assessed under
Knowlege & Understanding, Thinking, Communication,
and Application. |
Rubrics
Some rubrics are designed to give separate scores (levels)
for the categories of achievement being assessed in this
performance task that apply to specific curricula.
It is good assessment practice to:
- explain the rubric to the students before they begin
any assessment activity;
- to complete the “Teacher Comment Section”
of the rubric with what you liked best about the student’s
work and what one thing they should work on before another
similar task in the future.
- send home or keep in a portfolio the “Student
Copy” of the task, the student’s work and
the assessment rubric.
- you may be interested in developing Rubrics at www.Rubistar.4teachers.org.
B. LDCSB Assessment Documents
C. Effective Elementary Assessment and Evaluation
 |
Effective
Elementary Assessment and Evaluation: Classroom Practices
Clarifying Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting
How do we know that we are assessing and
evaluating in a balanced manner?
"Teachers ensure that student work is assessed
and/or evaluated in a balanced manner with respect
to the four categories of the Achievement Charts,
and that achievement of particular expectations is
considered within the appropriate categories."
|
- The four categories of the Achievement Charts
should be considered as interrelated, reflecting
the wholeness and interconnectedness of learning.
- Students have had varied opportunities to
demonstrate learning within each category of the
Achievement Chart by saying, writing and/or doing.
- Quality assessment tasks include all categories
of the Achievement Chart."
Implications for Practice
- "Provide time in class to assess."
- "Organize cross-curricular assessment
tools."
- "Plan rich assessments which take into
account all four categories"
- "Understand what work at each category/level
looks like."
- Optimize opportunities for integration.
- Include a variety of assessment tasks to meet
individual needs and learning styles.
Strategies for Success
- Use alternative assessment tasks.
- Plan for opportunities to observe and dialogue
with students.
- Acknowledge that some students may need more
time/differentiated assessments.
- Track homework and independent habits separately
as learning skills.
- Consider achievement across all categories
to determine the most consistent level with consideration
for more recent.
- Use category-based tracking sheets.
- Use an integrated approach whenever possible
to optimize time and practice for students.
- Take multiple intelligences and learning styles
into account when planning for instruction, practice,
and assessment.
- Develop/provide students with tools to support
self and peer assessment.
- Participate in related P.D. opportunities
and access available resources.
- Plan with the end in mind by ensuring that
tasks are varied and include all categories in the
achievement chart.
- Cluster the overall and specific expectations
to create rich and varied assessment tasks that
capture the key learnings.
|
| |
D. Thinking About
Assessment
 |
Damien Cooper's
"Talk About Assessment"
is a resource document that will frame much
of the professional development teachers experience
in the coming years.
For information on how to order a copy,
contact your principal (within the LDCSB). |
|
|